Opaque - People Don’t Fail, Leaders Do, Part II
Opaque
People
Don’t Fail, Leaders Do, Part II, by Jimmie Santee
Originally published Sep/Oct 2014 PS Magazine
As reported in the USA Today last February 21, Ashley Wagner called
the ISU judging rules, “too opaque.” “It’s not clear enough to the audience and
it needs to be more fan friendly so that we can get a wider fan base,” she said,
“I think we need to get rid of the anonymous judging.” Millions of fans
reportedly signed a petition demanding a full investigation, and eventually,
both the Korean Skating Union and Korean Olympic Committee filed a complaint
with the ISU against Ms. Alla Shekhovtseva, the Russian judge and wife of
Valentin Piseev, the General Director of the Russian Figure Skating Federation.
Shekhovtseva was seen hugging Adelina Sotnikova, the newly crowned Olympic gold
medalist in the media mix zone.
Many who watched the Ladies event thought that Yuna would win
her second Olympic gold. I was in that group, and in my opinion, the gold medal
race was closer between Yuna and Carolina Kostner.
But…I’m not going to discuss the results any further because
of anonymous judging. While everyone could see the protocols, there was no
direct proof that the judging was biased. I mean we could see it and smell it…
but there was no smoking gun regarding the marks. No Assessments (the term used
by the ISU to discipline judges for judging errors) were given.
Point in case – while the Korean Skating Union and Korean
Olympic Committee filed a complaint with the ISU, it was for an alleged
conflict of interest. Their Complaint led off with this paragraph:
We respectfully submit
this formal complaint (this “Complaint”) to the Disciplinary Commission of the
International Skating Union (the “DC”) and request for action to be carried out
in connection with the wrongful constitution of the panel of judges and the unjust
outcome of the competition caused thereby in the ladies’ single figure skating competition
(the “Competition”) at the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympic Games which were held from
19th to 20th February 2014 at the Iceberg Skating Palace in Sochi,
Russia.
A second complaint by the Koreans objected to Shekhovtseva
hugging Sotnikova in the mixed zone. With her marriage to Piseev, the Koreans
viewed her inclusion in the judging pool as a conflict of interest and suggested
her allegiance to her husband, the Russian Federation, and the Russian skaters
impacted her independence. The Russians reply, “Congratulating a champion and
winner of the gold medal in the opinion of the Alleged Offender is not a
violation of rules but a normal gesture and an appreciation of the skater’s
hard work.”
A Readers Digest version of the ISU’s answer to the
complaint:
Statement from the ISU, “Article
24 Paragraph 1 of the ISU Constitution 2012 provides, in part, as follows: The
DC serves as a first instance authority to hear and decide all charges referred
to it by any ISU authority or party against any Skater, Official, Office Holder
or other participant in ISU activities (Alleged Offender) accused of a
disciplinary or ethical offence (Offence).”
The result:
Complaint #1 is inadmissible and must be dismissed.
Complaint #2 is dismissed. “… It gives the impression to the
Panel, that the skater instigated the embrace and the Alleged Offender did not refuse
but returned the hug and kissed the skater.
The upsetting part of this whole debacle is that the core
issue of anonymous judging was never addressed; basically because the ISU rules
don’t allow for transparency or the right to challenge it.
In my last editorial, which was written prior to the ISU Congress
in Dublin, Ireland, I was highly critical of Cinquanta’s ISU presidency and
listed his many faults and failures as a leader. The list continues to grow. At
this recent congress, there was a proposal to eliminate anonymous judging. As a
rule, the ISU Congress needs a two thirds vote for the proposal to pass.
Beverly Smith, a long time reporter for Toronto’s Globe and Mail, reported that
a source told her the vote was close; 30 voted yes, 24 no, and two abstained.
Abstained? More surprisingly, Russia voted to change the rule and South Korea
did not.
I love a good Machiavellian plot… South Korea hosts the next
Olympics and votes to keep judging anonymous…to their advantage?…revenge? The
Russians got what they wanted; total domination (almost) of the Olympic Figure
Skating event on home soil. Why change the rule? The list of who voted down the
proposal included former Soviet bloc countries: Latvia,
Estonia, Lithuania, Belarus, Georgia, Poland, and Slovakia. If Russia was able
to do the math, they could vote for the proposal and come out looking like the
good guy… to be continued!
Comments